Distinguish · Notice
Ask · Check
Compare what people, characters, objects, and systems can do. Ask where answers come from and how to check them.
Curriculum / Human Agency and Relational Agency
How do children develop agency around intelligent, persuasive, and creative technologies? This working direction connects early childhood curiosity with later judgement, design, and responsibility.
Year groups are planning emphases, not universal developmental milestones or a scale for judging a child. The public direction is distinct from DCB’s school-owned seven-strand framework.
Six questions that travel
Each age group has a different emphasis. These questions return as children meet new systems, new pressures, and new responsibilities.
Compare what people, characters, objects, and systems can do. Ask where answers come from and how to check them.
Explore how design shapes interaction; practise boundaries, judge usefulness, and contribute to shared norms.
Consider identity, influence, system design, and the responsibilities of schools, families, companies, and communities.
Create transparently, design more responsible systems, assess evidence, and revise decisions under uncertainty.
Notice how an interaction feels and how it is designed; model what the system can and cannot do; choose boundaries; keep accountable human support in reach. A response can feel meaningful without carrying the knowledge or responsibility of a person.
Six recurring lenses: Notice · Model · Read the design · Choose · Reconnect · Shape.
Six lesson examples / Early Years to Sixth Form
Sort living beings, characters, ordinary objects, and responsive technologies using observable clues. A visibly teacher-voiced character makes a mistake; children correct it and match everyday situations to different kinds of help.
Compare three responses to a fictional drawing. Map what information each source could have, what it may be guessing, and what responsibility it can carry.
Compare an enthusiastic response with a constructive one. Separate what feels encouraging from what improves a plan or supports a decision.
Pause fictional transcripts to identify a feature, a response it might invite, a possible design explanation, and a proportionate next step.
Map a fictional week of AI use, then redesign a feature so that consequential needs lead back to accountable support. Consider dignity, privacy, and accessibility.
Label sources by method, claim, and limitation. Practise fair disagreement, then co-design a short screen-free activity for Year 2 with a primary colleague.
Reasoning, evidence, choices, and revision. Use shared fictional cases, equivalent opt-outs, teacher-controlled materials, and ordinary local safeguarding routes. The activities do not require personal disclosures or live chatbot accounts.
Read the research contextFor school projects, workshops, or questions about this work, tell me who you’re supporting and what you’d like help with.